Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Lennon - Dissertation Blog Post #2






     The problem of institutions and institutional leaders addressing safety issues on campus and providing solutions to improve safety on campus is grounded in the Communities of Practice (CoP) theory.  This theory was originally developed by Etienne Wenger and Jean Lave in 1991 and was primarily used to study individuals who not only share similar interest in a particular subject, but also interact regarding that subject by sharing ideas to further develop, improve, and create better solutions (Learning Theories, 2014).

     I feel this theory is appropriate because it recognizes the three necessities to be considered a CoP: 1. –Domain (or a shared interest) which in this instance is the institutional leaders who share a common bond of wanting stakeholders to be safe while on campus; 2. –Community (members of the domain share information amongst one another) which in this instance is the various institutional leaders and campus security of various campuses sharing their plan of how they address safety issues on campus; and 3. –Practice (sharing helpful tools), which encompasses the domain and community to interact and share information for problem solving (Learning Theories, 2014).

References:


Learning Theories. 2014. Communities of Practice (Lave and Wenger). Retrieved from: https://www.learning-theories.com/communities-of-practice-lave-and-wenger.html  

Saturday, May 13, 2017

Lennon Blog Dissertation Post #1

Problems Statement
Safety issues continue to evolve and rise on higher institutional campuses and leaders are tasked with developing and implementing ways to address such issues.

Statement of the Problem
Higher educational institutions have a responsibility to provide safety measures to students while on campus (Clery Center, 2017). As safety issues arise and are identified, institutions are required by federal regulations to disclose such issues to current and prospective students (McNeal, 2006).  More specifically, the Clery Act, mandates institutions, that partake in federal funding, to provide statistical data to stakeholders annually on criminal issues that have occurred on campuses, with the inclusion of ways in which to improve such issues (Clery Center, 2017).   Gun violence, sexual assaults, and alcohol-related crimes have been identified as continuous issues associated with reported incidents linked to college students while on campus (Dameron, Detardo-Bora, & Bora, 2009). Other issues surrounding the Clery Act are added as technology advances and crime progresses, which prompts the enhancements of dated laws to create newer laws, such as the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 (Myers, Nelson, & Forke, 2016). Therefore, institutions have addressed such issues in various ways to include providing knowledge and awareness about the issues, incorporating crisis preparedness plans, and combating certain laws related to concealed weapons permitted on campus (Patten, Thomas, & Wada, 2013).
More specifically, a firearm-related study, consisting of police chiefs of college campuses, who are tasked with providing safety on campus, demonstrated that 25% had been met with a gun-related incident on campus within the time frame of a year (Thompson, Price, Mrdjenovich, & Khubchandani, 2009). The controversy of allowing or banning concealed weapons on college campuses has been an ongoing debate as there are increased reports of suicides and mass shootings on college campuses (Thompson et. al, 2009). According to Hope (2015), many leaders of higher institutions are against concealed weapons being carried on campus as a way of protection. Despite the argument over constitutional rights and the wants of students regarding their safety, the argument of allowing concealed weapons on campus continues to gain controversy. A study conducted by Patten, Thomas, and Wada (2013), utilizing surveys to collect data, indicated that 70% of students and faculty felt unsafe and therefore did not want concealed firearms allowed on campus.

References
Clery Center, (2017). At the heart of campus safety. Retrieved from: http://clerycenter.org/about-page/
Dameron, S. L., Detardo-Bora, K., & Bora, D. J. (2009). An assessment of campus security and police information on college/university websites. Security Journal, 22(4), 251-268. Retrieved from: doi:10.1057/palgrave.sj.8350082
Hope, J. (2015).  Prepare for the implications on campus of concealed carry laws. Campus Security Report 12(3), 1-5. Retrieved from: 10.1002/casr.30062
McNeal, L. R. (2006). Clery Act: Road to compliance. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 19(3-4), 105-113. doi: 10.1007/s11092-007-9042-7
Myers, R. K., Nelson, D. B., & Forke, C. M. (2016). Occurrence of Stalking Victimization Among Female and Male Undergraduate Students, Journal of College Student Development, 57(2), 213-218. doi: 1826533795
Patten, R., Thomas, M. O., & Wada, J. C. (2013). Packing heat: Attitudes regarding concealed weapons on college campuses. American Journal of Criminal Justice : AJCJ, 38(4), 551-569. doi: 10.1007/s12103-012-9191-1
Thompson, A., Price, J. H, Mrdjenovich, A., & Khubchandani, J. (2009). Reducing firearm-related violence on college campuses-police chiefs' perceptions and practices. Journal of American College Health, 58(3), 247-254. doi: 848215802